Thanks, Bela and sorry for my confusing question!
Would you say that the bundler_type="new" is more performant than the
bundler_type="old" in 3.2.7?
Thanks,
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bela Ban" <bban(a)redhat.com>
To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:27:19 AM
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler
In 3.2.7, bundler_type="new" is the default. This uses a bundler that's
similar to the new bunder in 3.3.x (which actually started out as a copy
of the 3.2.x bundler). The 3.3.x bundler is more efficient though
On 6/5/13 4:15 PM, Alan Field wrote:
> Sorry, not sure where I was getting 2.7.x, I meant 3.2.x. (The version
> included with Infinispan 5.2)
>
> Sorry,
> Alan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bela Ban" <bban(a)redhat.com>
>> To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:11:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/5/13 3:51 PM, Alan Field wrote:
>>> Hey Pedro,
>>>
>>>>> 1) What is the default bundler used in JGroups 2.7.x?
>>>>
>>>> Bela is the right person to answer this, but I think the new bundler
was
>>>> created only in JGroups 3.3.x.
>>>
>>> So what happens if the JGroups 2.7.x config file has
>>> UDP.bundler_type="new"? Will it just be ignored?
>>
>> bundler_type doesn't exist in 2.7, so this will throw an exception and
>> the stack won't be started
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev