Manik, Bela, I think we send the requests sequentially as well. In
ReplicationTask.call:
for (Address a : targets) {
NotifyingFuture<Object> f =
sendMessageWithFuture(constructMessage(buf, a), opts);
futureCollator.watchFuture(f, a);
}
In MessageDispatcher.sendMessageWithFuture:
UnicastRequest<T> req=new UnicastRequest<T>(msg, corr, dest,
options);
req.setBlockForResults(false);
req.execute();
Did we use to send each request on a separate thread?
Cheers
Dan
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
yes.
On 1/27/12 12:13 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:42, Bela Ban wrote:
>
>> No, parallel unicasts will be faster, as an anycast to A,B,C sends the
>> unicasts sequentially
>
> Is this still the case in JG 3.x?
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups (
http://www.jgroups.org)
JBoss / Red Hat
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev