+1 to cover its functionality by CI, in whatever way.
Maybe it would be good to switch the flag by default when testing
then, so that our runs are comparable with Jenkins runs?
Or we could have a different job testing core only, that should be enough?
On 3 September 2012 16:58, Galder ZamarreƱo <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Re:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2237
We don't have a jenkins job to run with infinispan.unsafe.allow_jdk8_ch=true, but
instead of creating a new one, I'd suggest switching the testsuite to run with
infinispan.unsafe.allow_jdk8_chm=true
The reason I suggest this is cos we're confident things work as expected with the
JDK's CHM, so running the default testsuite with infinispan.unsafe.allow_jdk8_chm=true
would allow us to catch new failures wo/ the need of another job
Thoughts?
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev