Re: [infinispan-dev] Feedback on Infinispan patch

2009/9/12 Michael Neale <michael.neale(a)gmail.com&gt;: > That does sounds pretty cool. Would be nice if the lucene indexes > could scale along with how people will want to use infinispan. > Probably worth playing with. Sure, this is the goal of Łukasz's work; We know compass has some good Directories, but we're building our own as one based on Infinispan is not yet available. > > Sent from my phone. > > On 13/09/2009, at 8:37 AM, Jeff Ramsdale <jeff.ramsdale(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> I'm afraid I haven't followed the Infinispan-Lucene implementation >> closely, but have you looked at the Compass Project? >> (http://www.compass-project.org/overview.html) It provides a >> simplified interface to Lucene (optional) as well as Directory >> implementations built on Terracotta, Gigaspaces and Coherence. The >> latter, in particular, might be a useful guide for the Infinispan >> implementation. I believe it's mature enough to have solved many of >> the most difficult problems of implementing Directory on a >> distributed >> Map. >> >> If someone has any experience with Compass (particularly it's >> Directory implementations) I'd be interested in hearing about it... >> It's Apache 2.0 licensed, btw. >> >> -jeff >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev