On 07/07/2012 09:49, Paolo Romano wrote:
It looks very interesting Mircea.
Do you plan to support update operations on remote backups? May be you
have already some additional design documentation on this feature?
Thanks Paolo.
We've thought about it but it is out of scope for now. In the initial
version we only allow data to be written on the one (active) site, the
backup acting as a read-only hot standby. Each site can act as active
for a certain dataset(cache) and passive/backup for other dataset which
is active in a remote site.
Back to your concurrent update q: the simplest solution I have in mind
for that is by creating a distributed transaction over two caches: the
local one and the backup cache.
Cheers,
Paolo
On 7/6/12 2:06 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This[1] is the first draft of the cross-site (x-s)[2] replication bela and I came
with.
> Any feedback is more than welcomed!
>
> Cheers,
> Mircea
>
> [1]
https://gist.github.com/3059621
> [2] we've also thought of using the term 'site' instead of
'datacenter'. Dataceneter is a bit too specific, not as concise and also
inconsistent with the term 'site' we've been using for the
TopologyAwareConsistentHash.
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev