On 29 Apr 2013, at 14:05, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/29/2013 02:50 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2013, at 13:47, Alan Santos <asantos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> JON/RHQ give you a mostly read-only interface (attributes) and commands
>>> (operations), but it doesn't really give you a flexible way to modify
>>> the configuration (creating caches, adding cache stores, adding
>>> endpoints, etc)
>>
>> Why not? That's probably the top requested feature for the JON plugin.
Where ?
> Right. I'd rather we enhance the JON/RHQ plugin to do this rather than to start
on Yet Another Console. Are there any limitations to enhancing the JON/RHQ plugin?
>
The issue is not technical, but rather that there would be more
knowledge transfer/reuse between EAP and JDG.
And lots of reuse + knowledge of an existing console for our end users if we stick with
JON (which, after all, is the primary console we use right now).
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid