Adrian Cole schrieb:
This is interesting. What is important, afterall? In the case of a
grid, it is more like a quorum that allows operations to continue
without data loss. I'm not sure if individual instances matter as
complete sets of EC2s could go up or down and there still be no effect
on cluster as a whole.
This is a good question, that I was thinking about too
Would it not be the cache instances, or jgroups configuration that
are
the most important managed resource in this case?
Help me with the naming conventions here.
1 Infinispan istance can have n caches, that each has 1 jgroups channel?
In the cloud you have x IS instances with n caches.
So in this case, we could have the cache as top level element
below the "IS subystem". And the number of IS instances as
just a numeric metric.
In a later version of Jopr, we will have the possibility of "related
resources".
In this case we don't need the strict parent-child relation that we have
now.
Heiko