Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler

Thanks, Bela and sorry for my confusing question! Would you say that the bundler_type="new" is more performant than the bundler_type="old" in 3.2.7? Thanks, Alan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bela Ban" <bban(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:27:19 AM > Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler > > In 3.2.7, bundler_type="new" is the default. This uses a bundler that's > similar to the new bunder in 3.3.x (which actually started out as a copy > of the 3.2.x bundler). The 3.3.x bundler is more efficient though > > On 6/5/13 4:15 PM, Alan Field wrote: >> Sorry, not sure where I was getting 2.7.x, I meant 3.2.x. (The version >> included with Infinispan 5.2) >> >> Sorry, >> Alan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bela Ban" <bban(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:11:34 AM >>> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/5/13 3:51 PM, Alan Field wrote: >>>> Hey Pedro, >>>> >>>>>> 1) What is the default bundler used in JGroups 2.7.x? >>>>> >>>>> Bela is the right person to answer this, but I think the new bundler was >>>>> created only in JGroups 3.3.x. >>>> >>>> So what happens if the JGroups 2.7.x config file has >>>> UDP.bundler_type="new"? Will it just be ignored? >>> >>> bundler_type doesn't exist in 2.7, so this will throw an exception and >>> the stack won't be started > > > -- > Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev