+1 backwards compatibility seems important to me, especially in the
same mayor version.
Sanne
On 20 December 2011 12:24, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We certainly can do. It's not difficult to fix. By default I
allowed us to parse 5.1 and un-namespaced files. Thoughts? I think 5.0 and 5.1 are 100%
compatible, so it's just a 1 line change.
On 20 Dec 2011, at 08:36, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> Pete, since the introduction of the Stax parser, the REST test suite was failing
because it could not parse the 5.0 namespace. I solved it by changing it, but I was
wondering whether we should also be able to parse 5.0 configuration files, since we're
in the same major version ?
>
> Tristan
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-1629) REST server test suite should use 5.1
namespace
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:21:09 -0500 (EST)
> From: Tristan Tarrant (Created) (JIRA) <jira-events(a)lists.jboss.org>
> To: ttarrant(a)redhat.com
>
> REST server test suite should use 5.1 namespace
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-1629
> URL:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1629
>
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
> Assignee: Tristan Tarrant
>
>
> Since the introduction of the new Stax parser, the REST tests are failing because the
config xml uses the 5.0 namespace.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>
> For more information on JIRA, see:
>
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev