Re: [infinispan-dev] TotalOrder and jgroups

On 6 March 2012 14:30, Bela Ban<bban(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 3/6/12 3:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >>> Is this something similar to the shared transport [1] ? I'm not sure but >>> AFAIK the AS already uses a shared transport. Is what you suggest above >>> similar to a shared transport ? >> >> Ha yes that looks like perfect! >> But looking at the diagram, wouldn't it be useful to have those stacks >> share PING, MERGE2 and FD ? >> >> Taking a step further (and getting back to the topic), why not share >> the full stack up to SEQUENCER or COUNTER, >> so that we have two "virtual" channels but not having the two affect each other? > > On the todo list: [1], [2], [3]... It's not as trivial as it sounds > though... > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-844 > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-790 > [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-640 Great, thanks! In the meantime, do you think it would make sense to hardcode NO_TOTAL_ORDER flag in COUNTER usage ?