Re: [infinispan-dev] Comments on tutorials etc.
On 19 Jan 2011, at 15:11, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
>> On 18 Jan 2011, at 16:17, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>
>>> 12) http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala
>>>
>>> For "Cache with Transaction Management" I was not seeing TX
semantics being obeyed, I saw the size increment as a added key-value pairs
which
cache operation?
I imagine the size only increments within the transaction context? i.e. if you suspend the
uncommitted transaction and run the same operation again, you don't see
transaction's modifications.
>>
>> Galder, this as well?
>
> I'll check it out.
I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882 - This behaviour is like this since
since we accepted (Mircea?) the following community bug report:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679
Can we get an agreement on this? I think it should work as it did originally.
You
mean cache.values()? should not be tx aware? I think it should be consistent with all the
other ops, like put, get etc. (which are tx aware).
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.5 KB)