Exactly. Either distance or we do not need these machineId, rackId etc because they can be
reduced to one level....
On 2010-09-20, at 2:54 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Could it be a colocation distance?
Like level 1 same machine, level 2 same rack etc and have an ago that tries low levels
before higher levels?
Or should it just be localId (ie one level).
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblagoje(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to complete ISPN-180 lets agree on a definition of collocated nodes. So,
when are two nodes collocated? It depends on what we have defined as additional metadata
node input (i.e machineId, rackId, and/or siteId). If we have defined only machineIds then
the answer is obvious. However, if we have defined machineId, rackId, and/or siteId for
all nodes is it then that the non-collocated nodes are the ones having different siteId?
In another worlds if nodes have different machineId and rackId but the same siteId are
they collocated?
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Vladimir Blagojevic
JBoss Clustering Team
JBoss, by Red Hat