Re: [infinispan-dev] ReplicateCommand
>>
>> So, the interface it implements is more appropriately named
>> (CacheRPCCommand). Perhaps there should be 2 separate
>> implementations, SingleRPCCommand, MultipleRPCCommand?
<mailto:manik@jboss.org>
Why do we need the SingleRPCCommand? Can't we replicated the aggregated
command directly?