Re: [infinispan-dev] TotalOrder and jgroups

> Is this something similar to the shared transport [1] ? I'm not sure but > AFAIK the AS already uses a shared transport. Is what you suggest above > similar to a shared transport ? Ha yes that looks like perfect! But looking at the diagram, wouldn't it be useful to have those stacks share PING, MERGE2 and FD ? Taking a step further (and getting back to the topic), why not share the full stack up to SEQUENCER or COUNTER, so that we have two "virtual" channels but not having the two affect each other?