On 19 Apr 2011, at 18:17, Olaf Bergner wrote:
Am 19.04.11 16:59, schrieb Mircea Markus:
> On 19 Apr 2011, at 10:06, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
> So I presume you are building this as a separate Maven module, and making use of the
module-specific commands as described here [1] and [2] ?
>> Why would he need a separate module? He's not bringing any new dependencies
AFAIK
> Also large objects don't look orthogonal to the existing functionality ( e.g.
like the server are) but more like a core thing, like e.g. explicit locking.
> OTOH I think that these (large objects, eager locking) are features to be used by
"power users" and not necessarily to be exposed on the o.i.Cache interface. So
an interface within the same module, perhaps even extending o.i.Cache would make more
sense to me.
>
I personally favor a separate dedicated interface, e.g. StreamingCache
as has been suggested, and maybe a method getStreamingCache() on Cache.
yes, that
would do it indeed. Just not sure about the name: as long as you have Cache in it users
might expect to extend the Cache interface. StreamingHandler perhaps?
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev