Re: [infinispan-dev] MapReduceTask serialization

Yeah that sucks. I suppose we just need to specify that anonymous classes are not used. :/ On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:01, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > Hey, > > I've sort of hit a snag with the current MapReduce design and > serialization. Our MapReduceTask API allows users to specify Mapper, > Reducer and Collator interfaces as anonymous classes [1]. However, we > can not serialize instances of these classes as they are anonymous > [2](see Note in section 1.10). > > Of course, users can specify static implementations of these interfaces > and we can put a big warning notice about anonymous class > implementations of Mapper, Reducer and Collator but our MapReduceTask > fluent API itself nudges users to use anonymous classes :-( > > Not sure what to do! Ideas? > > > [1]http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanDistributedExecutionFramework... > > [2]http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/platform/serialization/spec/se... > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev