BTW why not <transaction timeout=""/>
what is the reasoning behind cacheStop?
On 4 févr. 2011, at 11:53, Manik Surtani wrote:
Yeah that works.
On 3 Feb 2011, at 19:29, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> In this end I went for <transaction cacheStopTimeout="30000"/> - in
case you wanna make any comments :)
>
>
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/154
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a solution for
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-915 which
involves TransactionTable waiting for some time before giving up waiting on on-going txs.
>>
>> Clearly, this wait time should be configurable and I was suggesting something
like:
>>
>> <transaction stopTimeout="30000"/>
>>
>> What should be the default value for it? 30s Ok?
>>
>> WDYT?
>> --
>> Galder Zamarreño
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev