Re: [infinispan-dev] Native CacheStore implementation?
On 12 Oct 2010, at 14:47, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 15:33, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)" <trustin(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:trustin@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Currently, we have two local CacheStore implementations - BDBJE and
> JDBM.
>
>
> Correction: there is also the FileCacheStore.
You are right. I missed that, argh! :)
How does it perform then comparing to BDBJE and JDBM? Out of curiosity,
if there is a good file-based cache store implementation, why BDBJE and
JDBM backends were introduced?
One reason is that FileCacheStore is not good with
transactions.Transactions & cache stores will get more attention in 5.0. Also
FileCacheStore is a BucketBasedCacheStore which might not be good if keys hash in the same
bucket.
I like your idea of native cache store though, and I think as long as we can outperform
the other stores we should only maintain that one.
--
http://gleamynode.net/
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev