Sorry dude, I'm a bit loaded these days (I know I'm preaching to the choir :)
+1 for separating GC and CPU diagram. I plan to update the code and run the benchmark on
your last release at some point this week, but that's a bit of a low prio atm.
Cheers,
Mircea
----- Original Message -----
From: "Galder Zamarreño" <galder(a)redhat.com>
To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Cc: "Mircea Markus" <mmarkus(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:09:21 AM
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] CPU and GC diagrams
Mircea?
On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hey,
>
> First of all, thx for incorporating my memory and CPU usage metrics
> :)
>
> I have a question though. In
http://goo.gl/n65ib diagram, wouldn't
> it be more useful if you had two lines per test? One for CPU usage
> and one for GC usage? That way, you could figure out which part of
> that CPU usage is GC and hence you might be able to map this with
> a reduction in thoughtput.
>
> In fact, what might be better is if you add GC usage (only!) to
> throughput diagram and then you can see immediately see if a drop
> in throughput is due to GC or not.
>
> WDYT?
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache