On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Pete Muir wrote:
On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:20, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Yes, agreed. Pete, any thoughts on why these changed?
This was discussed back at the time. We moved them precisely so that problem code would
show up.
Yeah actually I'd prefer that we revert this back to the old locations/names. There
is no reason why this should change. The version of the schema should be enough to
differentiate.
Galder, are you taking this on?
Thanks
- Manik
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org