On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Gustavo Fernandes <gustavo(a)infinispan.org>
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Sanne Grinovero
<sanne(a)infinispan.org>
wrote:
> On 11 August 2017 at 14:14, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Re:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8186
> >
> > I've been looking at TRACE logs and what seems to happen is that is
> that sometimes, when the client needs to create a new Socket, it sends
> using the same localport as the Hot Rod server port. As a result, when the
> client sends something to the server, it also receives it, hence it ends
> finding a request instead of a response. Analysis of the logs linked in the
> JIRA can be found in [1].
> >
> > What I'm not sure about is how to fix this... There are ways to
> potentially pass a specific localport to a Socket [2] but this could be a
> bit messy: It'd require us to generate a random local port and see if that
> works, making sure that's not the server port...
> >
> > However, I think the real problem we're having here is the fact that
> both the server and client are bound to same IP address, 127.0.0.1. A
> simpler solution could be a way to get the server to be in a different IP
> address to the client, but what would that be that IP address and how to
> make sure it always works? Bind the server to eth0?
> >
> > Any other ideas?
>
> You could create multiple aliases for the same loopback device, and
> assign a different IP address to each of them.
>
No need for aliases, we could use directly use any IP from the range
127.0.0.0/8
Just a reminder, the testsuite should be able to run on Linux/Win/MacOS so
I'd stay
away for OS specific extra steps
I tested on a recent Linux and Win, it works, but MacOS requires an alias
to be created...