I don't have a problem with including libraries in principle, but it really needs to
be worth it. In this case, there is no point dragging in a whole bunch of Hadoop stuff
for a single class implementation of a hash function. :-)
On 14 Jan 2011, at 03:20, david marion wrote:
Manik,
Being new here, I'm not totally sure of JBoss' stance on including other
libraries. Hadoop has a Murmur2 hash implementation that I have been using at work for a
while with no problems. Just a thought.
-- Dave Marion
> From: manik(a)jboss.org
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:35:44 +0000
> To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [infinispan-dev] MurmurHash fixes
>
> Guys,
>
> The MurmurHash2 impl we have in 4.2.0 is buggy in that my translation from the
original C source was faulty and it effectively hashes over just 31 bits instead of 32. It
means the distribution result isn't as good as it could be.
>
> Now it isn't that easy for me to just *fix* this in 4.2.1, since it means keys
mapped to nodes using 4.2.0 may not map to the same node in 4.2.1.
>
> So here is what I propose:
>
> 1) Fix it in 4.2.x as MurmurHash2A
> 2) Use MurmurHash2A by default, *unless* a config flag is provided that forces the
use of MurmurHash2. (e.g., <hash function="MurmurHash2">)
>
> This will even give us the ability to use MurmurHash3 in 5.0 when we have it.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers
> Manik
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik(a)jboss.org
>
twitter.com/maniksurtani
>
> Lead, Infinispan
>
http://www.infinispan.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org