Re: [infinispan-dev] Fluent config could be type-safe

Thought. It seems very easy to do things with the fluent builder API that either have no effect or have little effect - such as: new ConfigurationBuilder().clustered().clustered().clustered() While this is probably not a problem. The call to `.clustered()` could return a sub-configuration interface that would ultimately return an intermediate interface, only declaring methods that may be used to configure a cluster - thus making such a declaration syntactically illegal. Once a valid configuration state on this object (and its sub-objects) is reached, the returned interface type would present the user with a `ClusteredConfigurationBuilder`, e.g. a ConfigurationBuilder that is already clustered, and cannot be used to configure a cluster. I'm fully aware of how many interfaces this would require, but I also have a proof of concept that has shown to be very practically successful in eliminating user error for complex configurations, and has been well worth the effort: https://github.com/ocpsoft/rewrite/blob/master/api-tests/src/test/java/or... The above test does not verify invalid configuration ordering because it is actually a compilation error and cannot be tested with JUnit! But hopefully you get the idea. You can see the hierarchy of this (probably simpler than infinispan) configuration builder API here: https://github.com/ocpsoft/rewrite/tree/master/api/src/main/java/org/ocps... Any class that starts with "Configuration..." is part of the relevant API. Also, you could avoid an API-breaking change if provided a TypesafeConfigurationBuilder that simply delegates to the current ConfigurationBuilder API. Thoughts? -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev