Re: [infinispan-dev] An observation about total order and consistency

BTW, the results posted, both configurations had the flag syncCommit/RollbackPhase set to false. On 3/7/12 1:41 PM, Paolo Romano wrote: > I did not know about this change, thanks for pointing it out! By the > way, is it still possible to send commit messages asynchronously with > 2PC by changing the default config? I am asking as, in order to ensure > fairness when comparing the performance of the two protocols, it would > be better to make sure that they enforce the same semantic. > > Another possibility would be to extend the TOB-based replication > mechanism to support this semantic. Conceptually, this is not too > complicated, but coding that will still take some time... and I would > prefer to invest effort on TOM+partial replication. What do you think? > > Cheers, > > Paolo > > On 3/7/12 1:17 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> if I recall correctly currently (with 2PC) the commit is sent >>> asynchronously (without waiting to gather acks). >> The commit used to be send async (default) before 5.2, but now it is sent sync. >> *But* there were no complains with async commits AFAIK, which is a good thing. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev