All,
in Search we wrap the Parser in a decorator which workarounds the
classloader limitation.
I still think you should fix this, it doesn't matter how/why it was changed.
Sanne
On 26 May 2014 11:06, Ion Savin <isavin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Sanne, Galder,
On 05/23/2014 07:08 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 23 May 2014 08:03, Galder Zamarreño<galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> >Hey Sanne,
>> >
>> >I’ve looked at ParserRegistry and not sure I see the changes you are
referring to…
>> >
>> >>From what I’ve seen, ParserRegistry has taken class loader in the
constructor since the start.
> Yes, and that was good as we've been using it: it might need
> directions to be pointed at the right modules to load extension
> points.
>
> My problem is not that the constructor takes a ClassLoader, but that
> other options have been removed; essentially in my scenario the module
> containing the extension points does not contain the configuration
> file I want it to load, and the actual classLoader I want the
> CacheManager to use is yet a different one. As explained below,
> assembling a single "catch all" ClassLoader to delegate to all doesn't
> work as some of these actually need to be strictly isolated to prevent
> ambiguities.
>
>> >I suspect you might be referring to classloader related changes as a result
of OSGI integration?
> I didn't check but that sounds like a reasonable estimate.
I had a look at the OSGi-related changes done for this class and they
don't alter the class interface in any way. The implementation changes
related to FileLookup seem to maintain the same behavior for non-OSGi
contexts also.
Regards,
Ion Savin
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev