Re: [infinispan-dev] Implicit locking
On 5/25/09 10:49 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> Not so much. It is easier to do it from TxInterceptor I think. In
> overridden enlistWriteAndInvokeNext we create LCC instances and pass
> the along the chain. We will slightly change
> LockIterceptor#visitLockControlCommand to handle these specific cases
> - not so hard.
Ok
Hmmm, what about DistTxInterceptor? Do I need to create two subclasses
one for regular replication setup and another for dist?