Hey Sebastian,
I completely agree that hosting [1] in the /rest context is superior to [2]. I think that
is what you are proposing, right? :-)
Thanks,
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Laskawiec" <slaskawi(a)redhat.com>
To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:10:40 AM
Subject: [infinispan-dev] REST content directory
Hey,
A while ago I noticed that we have static directory with some
information
about REST interface in the feature pack [1]. The directory is put in the
server distribution ($ISPN_HOME/rest).
Our REST server doesn't host those files when accessing /rest
context. We
host [2] in this scenario. Those two web pages differ from each other and I
must admit, that [1] is much better.
I would like to propose removing [1] from the feature pack and
serving it in
the /rest context. Would you agree?
Thanks,
Sebastian
SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC
INFINISPAN DEVELOPER
Red Hat EMEA
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev