On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
On 3 Oct 2011, at 01:09, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 28 Sep 2011, at 10:56, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if the comment is valid though, since the old
>> StateTransferManager had priority 55 and it also cleared the data
>> container before applying the state from the coordinator. I'm not sure
>> how preloading and state transfer are supposed to interact, maybe
>> Manik can help clear this up?
>
> Hmm - this is interesting. I think preloading should happen first, since the cache
store may contain old data.
I can't find Dan's original email - was it set to the entire list?
Yes it was. Dan renamed the subject thread:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2011-September/009128.html
I don't get the entire context, but I don't think preloading *first* would
resolve the consistency problem in the case of deletions: what if you preload something
that was in between deleted from memory?
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache