Re: [infinispan-dev] Why no use async listener executor?

On Oct 6, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > > On 5 Oct 2011, at 16:53, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1396 >> >> While looking into this, I've discovered that we have been creating executors in cache level components, where we're calling submit from @Listener implementations. >> >> For example, BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener submits a rehash task and TransactionTable.StaleTransactionCleanup submits a tasks to break locks. >> >> Did the people that wrote these listeners (Dan & Mircea respectively) consider defining listeners to be called asynchronously? i.e. @Listener(sync = false) > this can work indeed for BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener? This seems like a small change - can you modify that in the scope of ISPN-1396 or do you want me to look into it? BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener? Dan seems to disagree. You meant TransactionTable.StaleTransactionCleanup instead?