Reading,
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Cross+site+replication, I've
spotted the following:
if CUSTOM failurePolicyClass requires a failurePolicyClass, it would have been wiser to do
this type of configuration:
<backup>
<customBackupFailurePolicy failurePolicyClass="x" />
</backup>
--
<backup>
<warnBackupFailurePolicy />
</backup>
…etc
Having failurePolicyClass as a property of backup that's optional but required when
backupFailurePolicy="CUSTOM" is clunky IMO.
WDYT?
Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org