On 3 Oct 2011, at 01:09, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 28 Sep 2011, at 10:56, Dan Berindei wrote:
> I'm not sure if the comment is valid though, since the old
> StateTransferManager had priority 55 and it also cleared the data
> container before applying the state from the coordinator. I'm not sure
> how preloading and state transfer are supposed to interact, maybe
> Manik can help clear this up?
Hmm - this is interesting. I think preloading should happen first, since the cache store
may contain old data.
I can't find Dan's original email - was it set to the entire list?
I don't get the entire context, but I don't think preloading *first* would resolve
the consistency problem in the case of deletions: what if you preload something that was
in between deleted from memory?