So we do have multiple participants within a "1PC" "transaction"?
Really? Seriously? Huh? WTF?
Mark.
On 3 Dec 2013, at 14:03, Mircea Markus wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Mark Little <mlittle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Oh please tell me your 1PC isn't really 2PC on multiple participants but without
a prepare phase?!
This is a non-default configuration option which we plan to get rid of in ISPN 7.0. Hence
this email :-)
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 29 Nov 2013, at 15:59, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
>> On Nov 29, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Mark Little <mlittle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you think there are no consistency guarantees? Again this may be a
difference in the way you use the term 1PC versus how it's used and implemented
elsewhere.
>>
>> Indedd, 1PC here has to do with the consensus protocol used by Infinispan
internally to update the same data on multiple nodes. Doesn't have to do with the
XAResource.commit(xid, isOnePhase) at all (we actually plan to implement that 1PC
optimization in the case a single node needs to be updated).
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
---
Mark Little
mlittle(a)redhat.com
JBoss, by Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor,
Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael
Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).