Re: [infinispan-dev] Lucene 4 / Infinispan performance

No I'm not comparing with Lucene 3.6 now with this configuration. It is well known that Lucene 4 is significantly faster than Lucene 3, so that would be unfair. What is interesting is that when comparing our implementations vs. the Apache stock ones while using Lucene 3 we where "very close", often a bit faster but not too exciting. Now comparing with the stock ones using Lucene 4 it seems we're getting into a better position... and I didn't even profile it, this is the first run after finishing coding the functional requirements. Still these figures are produced by a stress test whose primary purpose is to verify consistency and no-corruptions under stress.. I happened to add some metrics for fun, but to provide realistic figures one should run Lucene's own bench suite.. I'll do that next week. @Manik yes I'm not using a CacheStore, I would presume the same. This is why I've created the Lucene-specific CacheLoader, maybe I should complete the job and make it a CacheStore. Sanne On 29 January 2013 13:14, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: