Re: [infinispan-dev] TotalOrder and jgroups

On 3/6/12 3:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> Is this something similar to the shared transport [1] ? I'm not sure but >> AFAIK the AS already uses a shared transport. Is what you suggest above >> similar to a shared transport ? > > Ha yes that looks like perfect! > But looking at the diagram, wouldn't it be useful to have those stacks > share PING, MERGE2 and FD ? > > Taking a step further (and getting back to the topic), why not share > the full stack up to SEQUENCER or COUNTER, > so that we have two "virtual" channels but not having the two affect each other? On the todo list: [1], [2], [3]... It's not as trivial as it sounds though... [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-844 [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-790 [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-640