Precisely, it is simple.
I have 2 nodes in the cluster & I have 1 TRANSACTIONAL cache.
At the very same time (few millisecs apart, both the nodes starts to write
key/value into the cache.
Both the nodes write the exact same Key, but different values in each Node.
I just have 6 keys/values to write. But just after 2 or 3 entries, I see
this exception.
Since this is happening in a different thread (and not in the thread that
writes the K/V in the cache,
I am not sure which operation causes this.
Let me look @ the iSPN that you pointed out.
Thanks,
-Madhu
On 8/13/13 3:54 AM, "Mircea Markus" <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 13 Aug 2013, at 00:55, Madhu Venugopal (vmadhu) <vmadhu(a)cisco.com>
wrote:
> Hi Mircea,
>
> I asked this question in the IRC #infinispan.
>
> Madhu:Recently I faced an issue wherein, putIfAbsent is not atomic for
>a NON_TRANSCTIONAL cache (Infinispan 5.2.3.final)
What is your use case precisely?
Does it happen during rehashing? ISPN-3366 and ISPN-3357 should fix that.
> [4:37pm]Madhu:Advice was to use TRANSACTIONAL Cache.
> [4:38pm]Madhu:Hence we replaced the DummyTransactionManager to
>JBossTransactionManager and used TRASCTIONAL cache.
> [4:39pm]Madhu:With this change, i see that putIfAbsent is behaving
>better. But, I am consistently running into an exception :
> [4:39pm]Madhu:org.infinispan.CacheException: Remote transaction for
>global transaction (RecoveryAwareGlobalTransaction{xid=< 131077, 29, 36,
>0000000000-1-1-64-88-1100-573382911275000649,
>0000000000-1-1-64-88-1100-573382911275000700000000 >,
>internalId=281483566645250}
>GlobalTransaction:<Madhu-Mac-19065>:2:remote) not found
> [4:39pm]Madhu:after this exception, the cache goes completely out of
>sync.
> [4:39pm]Madhu:Can Anyone help ?
> [4:43pm]Madhu:seems similar to
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2719
>
> I see that you are working on it. Can you please let me know if you
>want me to try out any patch. I will be glad to :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Madhu
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)