Re: [infinispan-dev] CHM or CHMv8?

On 19 Apr 2013, at 05:07, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org&gt; wrote: > Why not. Only doubt I'd have is that other usages of the CHM are - I guess - services registry and similar configuration tools, for which write performance is irrelevant: your test measured puts, are there drawbacks on gets or memory usage? > See the original announcement on concurrency-interest by Doug Lea, and the subsequent comments. The design is up here too. One of the goals was to drastically reduce memory usage with CHMv8. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency/8140 Interestingly, Netty uses a backported CHMv8 as well - apparently inspired by our inclusion of it in Infinispan. ;) https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1052 -M -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid http://red.ht/data-grid