Re: [infinispan-dev] looking again at AS7-3290 and Hibernate 4.0.1...

On 02/07/2012 10:25 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > > On 7 February 2012 15:21, Scott Marlow<smarlow(a)redhat.com>  wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>>>> >>>>>  I'm not that worried about OGM (unless someone wants double buffering >>>>>  ;), its more about users wanting to package in different versions in >>>>>  Hibernate (newer/older). >>> >>> Even if someone wanted double buffering, OGM was already upgraded to >>> use Hibernate 4, so this doesn't apply. >>> >>> >> >> I think it depends on whether OGM will always work with the Hibernate >> 4.x version that is used in AS 7.x.  If OGM moves forward (Hibernate >> version wise) and starts requiring a different version than the one that >> is static wired into the Infinispan module, the user might want multiple >> Hibernate 4.x versions to be wired into the Infinispan module.  I'm not >> sure but if Infinispan has multiple versions of Hibernate in its >> classpath, that probably would interfere with the custom commands (I >> would think). > > > Good point. It's unlikely for OGM to need a 2nd level cache, but this > reasoning applies to Hibernate Search as well, for which we often > depend on a newer version of Core than what is provided by the AS. How hard would it be to allow a different way of passing the custom commands in?  Would this be a short term change in the next few weeks or longer term?