At least Spring Integration's core should be reasonably stable. After
all it's just a bunch of factory beans, nothing fancy here. Plus we have
a quite extensive test suite in place.
Cheers,
Olaf
Am 13.05.11 15:06, schrieb Manik Surtani:
Trust me, stability is top on my priority for 5.0. :-)
The Spring module is something Olaf contributed and it doesn't impact
stability efforts on the rest of the codebase.
Cheers
Manik
On 2 May 2011, at 16:00, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> I have a problem with the timing of this: 5.0.0.CR1 has already been
> released and the focus should be on bugfixing and documentation work.
> Therefore I believe this should be postponed to 5.1.0. I understand
> it is just an addition and not modifying anything already there, but
> it has its impact nonetheless (on the build process at any rate).
>
> Tristan
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 17:18, Olaf Bergner <olaf.bergner(a)gmx.de
> <mailto:olaf.bergner@gmx.de>> wrote:
>
>
> This is the first pull request I plan to issue for ISPN-961, the one
> targeting the master branch. I will issue another for 4.2.x as
> soon as
> this one is accepted.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org <mailto:manik@jboss.org>
twitter.com/maniksurtani <
http://twitter.com/maniksurtani>
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev