Thanks Tristan!
Crystal clear now.
In that case it has been decided: JIRA will be the tracking tool.
Thank you guys.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant(a)redhat.com>
To: "Tomas Sykora" <tsykora(a)redhat.com>, "infinispan -Dev List"
<infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Cc: "Vladimir Blagojevic" <vblagoje(a)redhat.com>, "sosic martin"
<sosic.martin(a)gmail.com>, "matija sosic"
<matija.sosic(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 10:49:42 AM
Subject: Re: Infinispan Management Console project - JIRA/gh issues?
Jira. The management console will need to follow Infinispan's lifecycle,
cross-link to internal issues, etc. We really don't want another tool.
Tristan
On 08/01/2015 10:45, Tomas Sykora wrote:
> Greetings all!
>
> I know that the team puts hands on more important stuff recently but I want
> to find out (decide) what tool do we want to use for driving issues for
> Infinispan Management Console sub-project.
> Currently, I am struggling with the fact that I have some ideas in my mind
> and I don't have a good place for raising an issue and further discussion.
> Also I am not aware of other contributors' intentions and I am not sure
> whether my effort is duplication of someone's work.
>
> Can we please decide what tracking tool do we use for Infinispan Management
> Console so we can start raising feature requests, discussions, issues,
> etc.?
>
> I personally vote for GitHub issues.
>
> Thank you very much for any input :)
> Tomas
>
>
--
Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat