Yes, agreed. Pete, any thoughts on why these changed?

On 7 Feb 2012, at 07:47, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hi, > > Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1842

> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1844

> > Both of these problems are rooted in the fact that both the path and the schema name changed in 5.1. > > IMO, both the path and schema should revert back to the old values. I don't see why these should change and it would make everyone's life easier.

> > WDYT? > > Cheers, > -- > Galder Zamarreño > Sr. Software Engineer > Infinispan, JBoss Cache > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Pete Muir wrote: > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:20, Manik Surtani wrote: > >> Yes, agreed. Pete, any thoughts on why these changed? > > This was discussed back at the time. We moved them precisely so that problem code would show up. Yeah actually I'd prefer that we revert this back to the old locations/names. There is no reason why this should change. The version of the schema should be enough to differentiate. Galder, are you taking this on?

Thanks - Manik -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:20, Manik Surtani wrote: > Yes, agreed. Pete, any thoughts on why these changed? This was discussed back at the time. We moved them precisely so that problem code would show up. > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 07:47, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1842 This is *not* caused by the move, it's actually shown up another problem.

>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1844 Yeah, this is caused by it though >> >> Both of these problems are rooted in the fact that both the path and the schema name changed in 5.1. >> >> IMO, both the path and schema should revert back to the old values. I don't see why these should change and it would make everyone's life easier. I'm not bothered either way. Just make sure we update any related tests. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> Sr. Software Engineer >> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Manik Surtani > manik(a)jboss.org > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Lead, Infinispan > http://www.infinispan.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev