No thoughts :) So you want to have each attribute in config.html have a reference to an appropriate bean field?

On 09-12-10 1:37 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: > > Just having a look at the latest generated config.html from a snapshot (attached), and comparing it with the equivalent, programmatic approach via the Configuration bean (again, javadoc attached), I see that there is no cross reference (nor any javadoc being generated for most of the config bean elements). Perhaps some mechanism to hyperlink between the two? > > Vladimir, I believe you had some thoughts around this? > > > > > > Cheers > -- > Manik Surtani > manik(a)jboss.org > Lead, Infinispan > Lead, JBoss Cache > http://www.infinispan.org > http://www.jbosscache.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

On 09-12-10 3:16 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 10 Dec 2009, at 13:44, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > >> No thoughts :) So you want to have each attribute in config.html have >> a reference to an appropriate bean field? > > And vice versa. It should be possible, right? Given that the > config.html file is generated off annotations on the bean fields? > Sure, it should be possible to create references in config.html file but vice versa I don't know - it involves some custom modification of regular javadoc generation process and I am not familiar with that part.

_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

On 09-12-10 3:27 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: > Well, we know the name of the target file (config.html!) and we know the name of the anchors that will be generated in each of these files (e.g., #clustering) so we could just add such links in the bean setter javadocs? > > Thanks for reminding me that solutions are often more simple than I think :) Ok, is this a priority for GA?