+1 backwards compatibility seems important to me, especially in the
same mayor version.
Sanne
On 20 December 2011 12:24, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> We certainly can do. It's not difficult to fix. By default I allowed us to parse
5.1 and un-namespaced files. Thoughts? I think 5.0 and 5.1 are 100% compatible, so
it's just a 1 line change.
>
> On 20 Dec 2011, at 08:36, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
>
>> Pete, since the introduction of the Stax parser, the REST test suite was failing
because it could not parse the 5.0 namespace. I solved it by changing it, but I was
wondering whether we should also be able to parse 5.0 configuration files, since we're
in the same major version ?
>>
>> Tristan
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-1629) REST server test suite should use 5.1
namespace
>> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:21:09 -0500 (EST)
>> From: Tristan Tarrant (Created) (JIRA) <jira-events(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> To: ttarrant(a)redhat.com
>>
>> REST server test suite should use 5.1 namespace
>> -----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: ISPN-1629
>> URL:
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1629
>>
>> Project: Infinispan
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
>> Assignee: Tristan Tarrant
>>
>>
>> Since the introduction of the new Stax parser, the REST tests are failing because
the config xml uses the 5.0 namespace.
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>>
>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>>
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev