I don't mind ;) I have heard that the maximum bandwith to S3 from an
account is 12MBPs (at an ec2 enterprise meeting a few months ago). I
haven't tried that. The "speed test" [1] I ran in the past was able
to run out of file descriptors sending to SQS, as at some point the
TPS were as much as 1600. I haven't re-run this using apache HC,
though.
Anyway, the settings I mentioned can be set to zero which will make
them unlimited.
I hope this helps.
-Adrian
[
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:55 AM, philippe van dyck <pvdyck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If you don't mind, since there is "no" limit from ec2
to s3
(
http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?messageID=1533...),
I would like to improve reliability first.
The actual fine tuning will never be achieved, since it depends on the size of the cache
entries, unless we find an http client with throughput management (QoS).
An ac2 small instance is supposed to deliver 20MBPS ... but frankly, I have doubts.
So I would like the CacheStore config to expose a maximum of options, since it the actual
optimization will probably happen very late in the development process.
cheers,
phil
Le 6 févr. 2010 à 08:54, Adrian Cole a écrit :
> The snapshot should be up to date, now.
>
> The challenge is to find the best tuning options out of the below:
>
>
http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/wiki/jcloudsAPI#Enterprise
>
> Let the games begin ;)
>
> -Adrian
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, guys.
>>
>> I think we are ok releasing a beta-4 that includes this fix and other
>> glitches we've found after this is shaken out. That can happen in a
>> couple days.
>>
>> maven SNAPSHOT job hasn't been moved to git, yet. Until we let you
>> know, testing this patch would involve a local build. Should be ok by
>> tomorrow.
>>
>> I hope this helps,
>> -Adrian
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org> wrote:
>>> Depends on when it comes in. If we are talking a few days, then yes.
Otherwise, either a point release of 4.0 or 4.1.
>>>
>>> On 5 Feb 2010, at 12:15, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you considering to include this in the next Infinispan release ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Sanne
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/5 Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org>:
>>>>> Adrian, once you have published the snapshot to your repo, we'd
need to:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Update CloudCacheStore to use this snapshot
>>>>> 2) Add provisions to be able to tune the CCS with
maxConnectionsPerContext, maxConnectionsPerHost, ioThreads and userThreads. Actually,
could mCPContext and mCPHost be combined into a single maxConnections setting for the CCS,
since we only create 1 context per instance?
>>>>> 3) Test, and release JClouds 1.0-beta-4 or cr-1. I'd like to
keep dependency on a snapshot to a very minimum timeframe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Manik
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5 Feb 2010, at 07:37, philippe van dyck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will be doing some heavy load testing in the next weeks, so
I'll be glad to test it, with Infinispan !
>>>>>> So the question is, will you update the Infinispan client too ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> phil
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 5 févr. 2010 à 07:01, Adrian Cole a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many of you know that the java and nio http engines and
jclouds have
>>>>>>> their own respective warts:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * the nio one is unreliable, as connection breaks under load
are not
>>>>>>> self-healing.
>>>>>>> * the default java one uses too many connections and memory
under load.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sam Tunnicliffe sent us a patch a while back to add support
for apache
>>>>>>> hc 4.0 [1]. I've revised this and committed to
trunk/1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>>>> I've also included this in the enterprise module.
Here's how to use
>>>>>>> that module:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/wiki/jcloudsAPI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please help kick the tires on this, as it is an important
piece of our
>>>>>>> core infrastructure. If you see any opportunities for
improvement, do
>>>>>>> shout out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=107
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Manik Surtani
>>>>> manik(a)jboss.org
>>>>> Lead, Infinispan
>>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>>>
http://www.infinispan.org
>>>>>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> manik(a)jboss.org
>>> Lead, Infinispan
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>
http://www.infinispan.org
>>>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev