I'm ok with not having a receive(MessageBatch) method, I don't see any
benefit for Infinispan either.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure adding receive(MessageBatch) to Receiver and to
UpHandler
is a benefit to applications. The current implementation simply calls
receive(Message) or up(new Event(Event.MSG, msg)), so each message in a
batch is delivered in turn.
I thought - if it turns out we need this - I can always add it later,
.e.g. in 4.0 where API breakage is allowed.
Thoughts ? I know this is pretty knew, so folks have probably not yet
played with this feature...
[1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1581
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev