Hi Balazs,
Thanks for the heads up.
On Oct 22, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Balázs Zsoldos <balazs.zsoldos(a)everit.biz> wrote:
Hi,
a couple of months ago I tested the new JSR-107 functionality of Infinispan. Distribution
and replication cache worked fine, however, I had problems with invalidation cache type.
If I called cache.put() or cache.update() the entries were deleted from other nodes. In my
understanding if I call cache.update() the entries on other nodes should be deleted but
they should be left there if I call cache.put() on a new node.
Am I wrong? Did you check this use-case?
I opened a question on stackoverflow at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16465807/jcache-api-usage-with-invalid...
but nobody answered.
I also opened a question in the Infinispan forum at
https://community.jboss.org/thread/228039 but nobody answered.
^ I've replied to that forum post now.
Is JSR-107 functionality specified anywhere in case of using invalidation cache?
Distributed cache is great, however, in case of read-intensive large data sets I think
invalidation cache type cannot be avoided due to performance reasons.
Thanks and regards,
Balazs Zsoldos
Software Architect
Mobile: +36-70/594-92-34
Everit Kft.
https://www.everit.biz
Everit OpenSource
http://everit.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org