On 6/16/11 9:00 AM, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> On 6/16/11 8:53 AM, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> No, that is wrong. I rejected AS7-1034. We still need to support app
>>>>> managed entity managers that can be JTA or RESOURCE_LOCAL.
>>>> We previously could work around issues like this via jboss-ignore.txt.
>>>> That could help here or perhaps something specific to JPA would be
>>>> better.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents would be that having a way to get any subsystem to ignore
>>> resources would be a good thing
>>> since you never know what insanities users are doing and will be
>>> doing in the future.
>>>
>>> Is there *anything* similar to jboss-ignore in AS 7 ?
>>
>> I've been working on a prototype for that
>
> Theres some discussion on IRC about the JPA issues. Stuart has a patch
> that prevents "non EE components" from acting on JPA annotations. We
> should definitely fix that bit (which will allow spring to work):
>
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1031
Jason, I've been trying Stuart's patch last night - and it worked great,
but this is a different issue - here you want to obviate stuff like
META-INF/persistence.xml from the JPA subsystem, so that the
bootstrapping of the PU doesn't even take plac
I have nothing against an ignore mechanism, but if we want JPA
plugability the proper mechanism for that is the spec described JPA
provider mechanism which will be in 7.1.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat