I guess this would a a reasonable addition to the management console.
But as far as aI can tell the low level clustering configuration isn't exposed through
the
management layer yet, is it?
Ike
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Exactly.
The foundation of the AS's clustering features are JGroups channels
where the instance of a channel on a given server discovers its peers
and exchange messages in a peer-to-peer topology. That discovery and the
ability to properly exchange messages depends on a consistent
configuration between the members of the cluster.
A server group is the logical way to achieve that consistent configuration.
However, if the user configured two server groups with the same
clustering configuration and the servers in the two groups were visible
to each other over the network, all the servers would form a single cluster.
On 6/8/11 5:39 AM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> AFAIK, a server group translates to a shared configuration and cluster (capability)
is
> orthogonal to a server group. I.e. you could have a cluster span 2 different server
groups.
>
> However, in most cases a cluster will be implemented as a server group.
>
> On 08/06/2011 11:19, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can somebody shed some light on the relation between server groups
>> (or domains in general) and clustering?
>>
>>
>> Ike
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev