Is separating the properties from operation and address a "this
seems
better" kind of thing, or is it critical in some way?
It would be a ton of work since it affects basically every piece of code
that either creates or reads an operation.
The JBAS-9112 change is much more limited; just a few places deal with
those "rollout-plan" and "rollback-on-runtime-failure" properties.
On 3/23/11 9:16 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
>
>> I think, this structural change makes sense. I'd also consider a
>> separate node for the properties since every other child node name is
>> fixed (operation, address) and to avoid collisions between the property
>> names and the fixed name.
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev