There are two solutions to this problem.
1) Switch the interaction to use plugable constructs (common SPI (interfaces &
superclasses), dynamically loaded implementation which depends on the common SPI)
2) Dynamically generate a module with an extra resource root to the same jar
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:29 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
OK. Thanks.
This is alright for now because we only have two JSF impls. But we want
to allow users to install additional impls. So it's a little ugly to
tell them that they have to make another copy of the jsf-injection
module for each one.
On 9/24/2012 9:47 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 07:49 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
>> On 9/24/2012 8:15 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>> Unfortunately this premise is flawed from the start: if you had two
>>> apps, each requiring a different JSF implementation, this idea could
>>> never work.
>> I'm not sure what you mean here. This is already working.
>>> In any case you cannot change the dependencies of a static module at
>>> runtime. Normally when multiple implementations are available you would
>>> use reflection to instantiate the implementation you need. If this is
>>> not possible then you'll need a separate module for each implementation
>>> type.
>> That's the problem. It's not that I need to instantiate something.
>> Rather, I need to put jsf-injection in a position where the JSF impl
>> will find my service and instantiate it. So the way things are now I
>> have to statically define a new jsf-injection module for each JSF impl.
>> Those modules are exactly the same except for one dependency declaration.
> If JSF is instantiating your module via SPI or similar then yes, you
> will need to clone your classes for each implementation because you're
> statically linking to the Mojarra API (meaning at run time your modules
> are no longer exactly the same as classes have different supertypes and
> so on).
>
>> If I could programatically define the module then I wouldn't have to
>> repeat myself.
>>
>> Maybe JBoss Modules was never meant to be used that way?
> If every Mojarra implementation is statically defined as a module, then
> you will have to create separate static modules for each one. If you're
> loading them in from a deployment then you should use the deployers' API
> for defining module dependencies to automatically tack on a copy of your
> integration classes.
>
> The reason this is so is that in order to have the very fast startup we
> have today, the initial module loader runs in a purely static environment.
>
>>> On 09/24/2012 07:06 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
>>>> I have a module defined like this (currently in master with main and
>>>> slot="1.2):
>>>> <module xmlns="urn:jboss:module:1.1"
name="org.jboss.as.jsf-injection">
>>>> <resources>
>>>> <resource-root
>>>> path="jboss-as-jsf-injection-7.2.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT.jar"/>
>>>> </resources>
>>>>
>>>> <dependencies>
>>>> <module name="com.sun.jsf-impl"/> <-----
this needs to be dynamic
>>>> <module name="javax.api"/>
>>>> <module name="org.jboss.as.web"/>
>>>> <module name="javax.servlet.api"/>
>>>> </dependencies>
>>>> </module>
>>>>
>>>> Inside a DeploymentUnitProcessor, the module above is added to the
>>>> ModuleSpecification along with the module for the selected JSF
>>>> implementation. The problem I have is that the JSF Injection code is
>>>> the same for any Mojarra implementation. But to support multiple
>>>> implementations I need to declare a separate jsf-injection module with a
>>>> hard-coded dependency on each implementation installed.
>>>>
>>>> If I could create a module dynamically and dynamically add its
>>>> dependencies then there would be no need to create more and more modules
>>>> containing the same jsf-injection jar.
>>>>
>>>> I've been looking at the JBoss Modules API and I don't see how to
do
>>>> this. Is it possible?
>>>>
>>>> Stan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev