I have the ability to disable the remote interfaces to the recovery manager working in the following pull request: https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/pull/58 In this request I raise the question of whether the current configuration is too low level in that it is largely a mapping of the tm configuration beans, and it takes a combination of two properties to achieve the result of disabling the recovery manager remote interfaces. Perhaps just a single enable-remote-access on the recovery-environment that sets appropriate properties on the underlying RecoveryEnvironmentBean and CoordinatorEnvironmentBean would be a better solution.

If someone has time to rework it for 7.0, I'd love it. I wanted to do some work on it this week, but time is looking tight. On 6/15/11 11:37 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote: > On 06/15/2011 11:24 AM, Scott Stark wrote: >> I have the ability to disable the remote interfaces to the recovery >> manager working in the following pull request: >> https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/pull/58 >> >> In this request I raise the question of whether the current >> configuration is too low level in that it is largely a mapping of the tm >> configuration beans, and it takes a combination of two properties to >> achieve the result of disabling the recovery manager remote interfaces. >> Perhaps just a single enable-remote-access on the recovery-environment >> that sets appropriate properties on the underlying >> RecoveryEnvironmentBean and CoordinatorEnvironmentBean would be a better >> solution. > Yeah it's always been my wish to present a higher-level configuration. > The config beans have a lot of problems and reflecting them in the > configuration itself is a mistake. > > The configuration should be use-case driven, and the subsystem API > should be a reflection of that. The config beans layer really seems to > have little to do with use-cases or implementation for that matter. > > All that said though - I'm not sure we have enough time before 7.0 to > make this change. It might have to wait for 7.1. We'll have to see > what Jason and Brian say.